PIH Leaders Oppose Catastrophic U.S. Bill Blocking Asylum Seekers
Legislation could reinforce immigration policy with doubtful links to COVID-19 prevention
Posted on May 16, 2022
UPDATE (May 16, 2022): On April 1, Partners In Health (PIH) celebrated the end of Title 42, unjustified for public health reasons, excited that Haitians and others seeking asylum in the United States may soon face a more humane process while trying to enter the country. However, there are now bipartisan bills in both the Senate and House that would keep Title 42 in place indefinitely, and could have lasting, catastrophic impacts on the United States’ asylum system.
On May 12, the White House hosted its second global summit on COVID-19. Despite calls for resolve and funding in our global pandemic response, U.S. lawmakers continue to hold up any further COVID-19 response money by demanding the continuation of the unjustified Title 42 order that has denied asylum to refugees at our southern border.
“It is a shame that lawmakers would rather play politics with the lives of millions seeking asylum than fund vaccines, treatments, and tests for impoverished communities in the U.S. or around the world,” said Cate Oswald, PIH's chief policy and partnership officer. “We are calling on lawmakers to pass COVID-19 funding for domestic and global responses without the Title 42 order, which has already allowed the administration to expel more than 22,000 Haitians from the United States. As an organization that stands in solidarity with the people of Haiti, we urge lawmakers to reverse course immediately.”
Partners In Health is asking supporters to take action to ensure the U.S. Congress does not advance policies to reinstate Title 42.
April 1, 2022
Haitians and others seeking asylum in the United States may soon face a more humane process while trying to enter the country. That’s because an unjust order will be terminated in May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced on April 1.
The order, known as “Title 42”, has allowed the Trump and Biden administrations to prevent migrants from crossing the U.S.-Mexico border in order to stop the spread of COVID-19. However, those who oppose the order—including Partners In Health (PIH) leaders—argue that there is no public health evidence that the order effectively stops the spread of the virus.
The Title 42 order is now being lifted, more than two years since it went into effect.
“What a relief,” says Cate Oswald, PIH’s chief policy and partnership officer. “We’re happy that after two years this is finally being recognized by the CDC as unjustified for public health reasons. We’re happy the Biden administration and the CDC see that.”
For two years, PIH leaders have advocated to end the policy and in March, they co-authored a Perspective piece in The New England Journal of Medicine–published two days after the two-year anniversary of the order. Although the order will soon be overturned, opponents of the measure must not be silent, cautions Oswald.
“We need to continue our advocacy to ensure that immigration policy and reform continues to move forward. And we need to continue to hold the Biden Administration accountable,” she says.
The end of the order will hopefully mean a more just process for Haitians and other asylum seekers. In turn, this may also result in fewer people being immediately expelled while giving them more access to representation and an opportunity to be heard. While the order was in place, Haitians in particular have been disproportionately affected. Since February 2021, more than 21,000 Haitians—many of whom were subjected to inhumane treatment—have been deported.
On May 23, the order will officially be terminated. Over the coming weeks, the CDC will work with the Department of Homeland Security to implement COVID-19 vaccination programs for migrants, among other protocols, according to the April 1 announcement.
“This is a victory in the sense that so many people have been working deeply on a daily basis with Congress to encourage CDC to stop enforcing Title 42 as a public health order justifying turning away asylum seekers” says Oswald.